A New Trend…

I have met with a lot of clients this year, and there is a growing trend that most people need to be made aware of.  For some various reasons (we will get into them later), workers are being misclassified.   This seems to happen more in the creative industry, but it is making its way into the main stream.  This is a misunderstanding by employers of the rules, and can cost you several thousands of dollars.  However there is a remedy.  So, the story goes that you get hired as “temporary help,” with a company.  As I said, it is usually in their creative department, but it is starting to seep into other fields.  An employer will hire you and treat you as an independent contractor.  After a few months, that SAME employer will hire you on as an employee.  There are SEVERAL reasons why this is bad for you.

First of all, the IRS takes the stance that if you work under someone’s direction, you are paid by the hour or by the piece, if you use your employer’s equipment or tools, you have set hours that you are supposed to work, then you are considered an employee of that company.  NO QUESTIONS ASKED.  For instance, you go to work for a company in an office setting.  You have to be at work at 8:00 am and you leave at 5:00 pm.  The company provides you with a desk, a computer, and other equipment, you have a boss or a supervisor that you report to, and you get scheduled breaks, you are that company’s employee.  The reason that an employer doesn’t want to classify you as an employee is that they are responsible for half of your Social Security and Medicare Tax, they have to pay both Federal and State Unemployment, and you might be eligible for benefits.  So, what happens is that they pay you as an independent contractor, not withholding any taxes, and thus are not responsible for any employer related taxes on what they are paying you.  They don’t have to pay you overtime, and they don’t have to pay you any benefits if the company has benefits.  All of this is fine until you have to pay your taxes.

In this situation, you receive a 1099-MISC with an amount reported in the Non-Employee Compensation box.  Employers now a days call it “freelance” work.  You have to, not only pay income tax, but you have to pay 15.3 percent in Social Security and Medicare Taxes.  If you were an employee, you would only be responsible for 7.65 percent of Social Security with the additional 7.65 percent paid by your employer.  Because your employer misclassified you as a self-employed individual, YOU are responsible for all of these taxes.  .  If you are in the 15 percent tax bracket, you could be paying upwards of 30 percent in income taxes.  What makes matters worse, is after this “probation period,” your “employer” will then bring you on as an employee.  As I see this more and more, I cringe.  Do these employers have accountants?

Let me tell you what the IRS says about this.  First of all, with the rules I mentioned before about your work conditions, the IRS will classify you as an employee.  But there is more.  If that wasn’t reason alone for the IRS to reclassify you, if your employer has hired you on as an employee after this probationary period, the IRS will certainly reclassify you.  The IRS’s position is that once your employer considers you an employee, you are ALWAYS an employee.  This whole situation begs the question: Why is this going on so much?  The answer is, I don’t know.  Perhaps one employer is doing this, and other employers see that they are getting away with it so they are following suit.

What should you do if this is happening to you?  Very simple.  When you file your tax return in April you file Form SS-8 with your tax return, and let the IRS determine your employment status.  On your tax return, you will be responsible for ½ of Social Security and Medicare, but the IRS will go after your employer of the additional amount.  I do want to caution you on something; you should only file this form if you are no longer working for that employer.  Filing this form will, almost, certainly get you fired.  When you file this form the IRS will launch a full investigation of your employer, and that is not pretty.  The employer will not only be responsible for paying their share of Social Security and Medicare, they will be hit with a 100 percent Trust Fund Penalty, for misclassifying you in the first place.  This may seem farfetched, but I file, at least three of these forms a year.  Never once have I had the IRS come back and say that my client was wrong.

If this is going on with you now, or has gone with you, and you want to fight back, give us a call at 1-855-IRS-2-911, or email us at help@taxcrisiscenter.com.  Let YOUR Voice Be Heard®

What Are Your Chances Of Being Audited?

Have you ever wanted to know what your chances are of being audited by the Internal Revenue Service? The IRS has issued its annual data book, which provides statistical data on activities conducted by IRS from Oct. 1, 2012, to Sept. 30, 2013, and includes information about returns filed, taxes collected, enforcement, taxpayer assistance and IRS’s budget and workforce. In addition, the data book provides valuable information about how many tax returns IRS examines (audits) and what categories of returns IRS is focusing resources on, as well as data on other enforcement activities such as collections.

The annual book is jam-packed with information. For instance, during fiscal year 2013, the IRS collected almost $2.9 trillion in revenue. They also processed 240 million returns. The interesting part is that only 151 million of those were filed electronically. Out of the 146 million individual tax returns that were filed approximately 83% were e-filed. One the 118 million individual income tax return filers received a tax refund. Tax refunds told $312.8 billion.  An interesting fact, is that on average the IRS spends 41 cents to collect $100 in tax revenue. This matches the low-cost results for 2008 and 2001.

Now for the good stuff. What are your chances of being audited? During fiscal year 2013, the Internal Revenue Service examined 0.8% of all returns of a filed in calendar year 2012. About 1% of all individual income tax returns were filed in calendar year 2012, and 1.4% of corporation returns were audited. Overall, individual income tax returns and higher adjusted gross income classes were more likely to be examined the returns and lower adjusted gross income class. This brings up an interesting point, the IRS does not seem to waste their resources on people in lower tax brackets. The reason for this, is that they can obtain more revenue through audited taxpayers with higher income. It’s a numbers game.

The next interesting fact is that the returns that were audited 24.5% were audited by revenue agents, tax compliance officers, tax examiners, and revenue officer examiners. 75.5% of the returns were audited were handled via correspondence audit. That means by the mail.

  • For business returns (for individuals not claiming the EITC and for other than farm returns) showing total gross receipts of $100,000 to $200,000, 3% of returns were audited in FY 2013, down from 3.6% in FY 2012.
  • For business returns (for individuals not claiming the EITC and for other than farm returns) showing total gross receipts of $200,000 or more, 2.7% of returns were audited in FY 2013, a decrease from 3.4% in FY 2012.
  • Of the returns showing farm (Schedule F) income, 0.4% were audited in FY 2013 versus 0.5% in FY 2012.
  • For nonbusiness returns showing total positive income of $200,000 to $1 million, 2.5% of returns were audited (down from 2.8% for the previous year); for business returns, 3.2% of such returns were audited (down from 3.7% for the previous year). In general, total positive income is the sum of all positive amounts shown for the various sources of income reported on the individual income tax return and, thus, excludes losses.
  • For FY 2013, the audit rate for returns with total positive income of $1 million or more was 10.8%, down from the 12.1% rate for FY 2012.

For all corporate returns (other than Form 1120-S), the audit rate in 2013 was 1.4% (down from 1.5% in the previous year). For small corporations with balance sheet returns showing total assets of: $250,000 to $1 million, the rate was 1.3%; for $1 to $5 million, the rate was 1.4%; and for $5 to 10 million, the rate was 2.0%. For FY 2012, the percentages were, respectively, 1.7%; 2.1%; and 2.6%.

For large corporations with returns showing total assets of: $10 to $50 million, the audit rate was 7.0%; for $50 to $100 million, the rate was 15.5%; for $100 to $250 million, the rate was 19.4%; for $250 to $500 million the rate was 22.5%; for $500 million to $1 billion, the rate was 27.5%; for $5 billion to $20 billion, the rate was 60.9%; and for $20 billion or more, the rate was 91.2%. For FY 2012, the percentages were, respectively, 10.5%; 20.7%; 23.2%; 22.7%; 22.7%; 31.4%; 45.4%; and 93.0%.

It is really interesting to know what the facts are.

How a Tax Return is Selected for Audit, and the Audit Process

I am not a doctor, but I know that there is a direct correlation between an IRS audit notice and a heart attack.  In this week’s article I am going to take you through how a return is selected for an audit, the different types of audits, your rights as a taxpayer, and other useful tips if you are one of the unlucky people that has to face an IRS audit.

I have been a licensed Enrolled Agent for 20 years.  Enrolled Agents are licensed to represent taxpayers before the Internal Revenue Service.  One of my companies Tax Crisis Center®, LLC does nothing more than IRS audits, collections, and representation before the United States Tax Court.  The following is a summary, although not all inclusive of my experience.  I will tell you that if you choose to handle your audit yourself, and you realize that you are over your head, at any time you can tell the examiner that you want representation, and the audit has to stop.

Selecting Tax Returns for Examination

It is helpful to understand how tax returns are selected for examination. The IRS selects returns for examinations in several ways — some based upon objective criteria coded into a carefully protected computer program and others based upon old fashioned detective work.

The majority of tax returns selected for examination are selected by a computer program that the Service uses to identify returns for examination called Discriminate Function System. The Discriminate Function (DIF) score is the product of a mathematical formula for identifying and selecting returns for examination. The program scores tax returns using a formula based on historic information obtained from specific examination programs. A high DIF score indicates a high potential for adjustment.  Every few years the IRS will randomly select about 100,000 returns for audit.  The purpose of these audits is to update the DIF system.

Different types of taxpayers and returns are subject to different DIF formulas. While the specifics of the program are not public, certain items appear to cause a return to be selected for audit.  These items include, but are not limited to participation in a tax shelter, large charitable contributions, home office deductions, large travel and entertainment expense or large automobile expense. Returns selected under the DIF program are then manually screened so that attachments to the return and other data that a computer cannot detect can be properly considered.  After all, a computer program can only do so much.

The Service also relies on information provided by third parties, such as banks, brokers and employers.  A lot of taxpayers don’t realize that the IRS has access to all of your income and deduction records.  Much of this information is required to be reported by payers of certain types of income on Forms W-2 or 1099. Referrals may also be made by other examining agents. For example, the return of a party related to another taxpayer being audited, such as the partners of a partnership being audited may also be selected for audit. The Service also may investigate tips regarding potential noncompliance, and select those returns for audit as a result. Examinations may also be triggered a variety of other ways, such as, by mathematical errors or missing information. Also, a claim for refund (an Amended Tax Return) can trigger an examination, as well.

Types of IRS Examinations

IRS civil examinations can take a variety of forms, depending upon the type of taxpayer, the complexity of the tax return and the initially determined scope of the exam. The simplest examinations conducted by the IRS are Campus Examinations. Campus Examinations are correspondence exams, typically carried out through the mail.  These examinations address simple problems like substantiation that can be resolved easily by correspondence and/or telephone. Area Office Examinations may be conducted for slightly more complicated issues such as small business returns and more complex non-business returns. Area Office Examinations may be conducted by correspondence, office interview, where you or a representative are required to go to the IRS office or even by a field examination, where the IRS comes to your place of business or home.  The methods by which these examinations occur depend on type and complexity of the return. In all cases, the taxpayer is asked to provide supporting documentation of questionable items. Business returns will always be examined in an office or field interview rather than a correspondence examination.

As a practical matter, examiners at the correspondence and office levels are much less invasive. The caseload of most examining agents are ridiculous.  These agents are required to process many cases and often have little time to completely familiarize themselves with the return. Indeed, the examiner may not have reviewed the taxpayer’s file and return until after the taxpayer has replied to all correspondence regarding the examination, and often not until the day of the interview. The scope of office examinations is generally limited to items on a checklist of issues contained in the Internal Revenue Manual. The examiners have little discretion and basically, are charged with verifying income and deductions based upon records provided. A taxpayer’s inability to produce adequate records may lead not only to disallowance of the disputed items for the year at issue.  The disallowance of some items may open other open years for examination.  For instance, if you cannot prove your auto deductions in the year being examined, the IRS will open other years to make sure that you complied on those returns.

Field Examinations involve more complex issues. The examining agent will be a revenue agent, as opposed to an office auditor. He or she will be better trained and will have had more experience. A Field Examination consists of examination of a taxpayer’s books and records at the taxpayer’s place of business or where the books, records or source documents are maintained. The agent will review the taxpayer’s entire return and all documentation related to that return. The agent may be assisted by a technical specialist such as an “engineer agent” if the return presents a special issue such as valuation. Unlike, office auditors, revenue agents spend considerable time preparing for the examination. Prior to the examination, the revenue agent will review any prior examination reports from the same taxpayer. This may lead to scrutiny of recurring issues or inclusion of other years’ returns in the examination. Of course, the revenue agent will also look at the return for unusual or questionable items.

Taxpayer Rights During an IRS Audit

In 1998, Congress held Congressional hearings on the IRS’s practices and out of that came the Taxpayer Bill of Rights.  Taxpayers are guaranteed certain important rights during audits and examinations. Among these rights is the right to be provided certain information describing the examination process and other rights at the commencement of the examination. Examinations must be conducted at a reasonable time and place and taxpayers have the right to bring representation to any interview. Taxpayers have the right to record any interviews with the agent, with advanced notice.  Taxpayers also have the right not to be interviewed, except through the summons process, and must be notified of any summons to a third party and of their right to quash any such summons. Importantly, taxpayers have the right to have their tax information kept confidential.

Burden of Proof

There used to be a time, pre 1998 that there was a rebuttable presumption that IRS’s determination of tax liability was correct, and therefore (with some exceptions such as fraud), the burden of proof was on the taxpayer to show that the IRS’s determination was wrong. After 1998, the IRS has the burden of proof in any court proceeding with respect to a factual issue related to income, estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes if the taxpayer introduces credible evidence relevant to the determination of the taxpayer’s tax liability. To be eligible, the taxpayer must prove that he or she complied with required statutory and regulatory substantiation and recordkeeping requirements; cooperated with reasonable IRS requests for meetings, interviews, witnesses, documents, and information; and (if not an individual) met certain net worth limitations. Cooperation generally involves: providing reasonable assistance to the IRS in accessing witnesses, information, and documents not within the taxpayer’s control; exhausting administrative remedies, including IRS appeal rights; and establishing the applicability of a privilege. Cooperation does not require that the taxpayer agree to an extension of the limitations period. The IRS continues to have the burden of proving fraud, irrespective of the new law.

Interacting with the IRS Agent

Here is my advice to anyone that is being audited.  Hire someone to represent you that has extensive audit experience.  My company Tax Crisis Center® has handled many IRS audits, and from experience we know how to handle an IRS agent or officer.  When Tax Crisis Center® is engaged, the person that has hired us is not allowed to talk to the IRS agent or officer.  If they do, then we end our representation.  Being audited by the IRS is sort of like being arrested and questioned by a police officer.  Everyone knows that guilty or innocent you always want an attorney to answer any and all questioned posed by the police.  You really should not do this yourself.  All meetings should take place at the representative’s office, not the taxpayer’s place of business. Direct contact between the agent and the taxpayer (or taxpayer’s employees) should be minimized. Agents are trained in interviewing techniques designed to elicit information. They will ask open ended questions, and will listen carefully to the responses. Taxpayers who meet with an agent should be careful to answer only the question asked.

Absent having been served an administrative summons, a taxpayer has the right to refuse to be interviewed. Although, historically examining agents have been reluctant to press for taxpayer interviews, examining agents have become more aggressive in seeking taxpayer interviews and using summonses to compel them. If interviewed pursuant to a summons or otherwise, the taxpayer has a right to counsel and may assert appropriate privileges.

Care should be taken to create a complete record of all information provided to the examining agent. Maintain a detailed record of all documents and records provided to the examining agent. Maintain a record of any oral communication with the agent whether in person or by telephone. Confirm any material oral agreements in writing.

How Agents Gather Information

During the examination, the agent may request various types of documentation to verify items of income and expense on the return, including records, such as receipts, invoices, books, and worksheets. Revenue agents may also review prior or subsequent tax returns or the returns of related taxpayers.

Generally, agents have broad powers to compel production of relevant information. HOWEVER, certain types of information may be subject to privilege or otherwise not subject to compelled production. Once provided, the privilege is likely to have been waived. For example, an agent may ask to see receipts to substantiate a deduction claimed for professional services, such as accounting or legal fees. The descriptions of the services provided could contain information leading to another adjustment. If the descriptions of the services may be privileged, the taxpayer may be able to withhold the actual invoices in favor of some other proof of payment, like a credit card statement, or may be able to provide redacted invoices.

Keep in mind that the taxpayer’s books and records may contain confidential information of another taxpayer, such as IP or the terms of a contract. The taxpayer may be under a contractual obligation to keep this information confidential. If the agent cannot be convinced to accept redacted documents, the taxpayer may want to decline to produce the document unless an administrative summons is issued compelling its disclosure.

An IRS agent will typically request documents and other information by issuing an Information Document Request (IDR). Initial requests at the beginning of an examination are typically fairly broad with subsequent requests focusing on specific issues. Keep careful track of IDR requests and items produced. Always maintain a duplicate copy of any documents that are provided and include a transmittal letter with any response describing the documents produced.

If a taxpayer fails to produce requested items, the Service can summons a taxpayer or third party for books, records or testimony. Agents are directed to make an attempt to obtain information informally before issuing a summons. Agents are instructed to consider issuing a summons when a taxpayer fails to make requested records available within a reasonable period of time; where the records submitted are known or suspected to be incomplete and the examining agent believes that additional records containing relevant and material matter may be in the possession of the taxpayer or a third party; and when the examining agent is in doubt as to the availability of pertinent records and wishes to obtain oral testimony as to what records may exist and their location.

The End of the Audit Closing as Agreed or Unagreed

The conclusion of an audits can be either closed as agreed, meaning you sign the audit adjustment form, or as unagreed, you do not sign the audit form.  Of course, if the taxpayer presents sufficient documentation for the items at issue, the examining agent may accept the return as it was filed. If the taxpayer and the examining agent reach an agreement on adjustments, the taxpayer and examining agent complete a form describing the adjustments to the return and agreeing that any additional tax may be assessed. Where the taxpayer and the examining agent cannot reach an agreement, the examining agent’s next step will depend upon whether there is sufficient time remaining on the statute of limitations on assessment (generally six months). If there is sufficient time left on the statute of limitations, the examining agent will prepare a report that will be reviewed by the examining agent’s manager. Once approved, the report is sent to the taxpayer along with a “30-day letter”. If there is not sufficient time left on the statute of limitations and the taxpayer will not agree to extend the statute, the report will be sent to the taxpayer with a statutory notice of deficiency (sometimes referred to as a “90-day letter”).

A 30-day letter gives the taxpayer an opportunity to protest the examining agent’s proposed adjustments to an administrative appeals officer. The taxpayer has 30 days within which to submit a written protest outlining the taxpayer’s position on fact and law.  The Appeals Division of the IRS is a completely different division than audits.  Appeals is a neutral third party that looks at the disputed items with a fresh look.  Appeals officers are charged with evaluating the case ex parte based upon the record created by the revenue agent and as supplemented by the taxpayer. The appeals officer can uphold the examining agent; find for the taxpayer or attempt to reach a settlement with the taxpayer. The appeals officer is instructed to consider the “hazards of litigation” for both sides in his or her evaluation of the case.

The Hazards of Litigation basically is the probability that either the taxpayer or the government will win on appeal to the United States Tax Court.  If the Appeals Officer feels that the taxpayer has a strong case, then typically the disputed items will be accepted.  However if the Appeals Officer feels that the government has a strong case, the disputed amount will be denied.

If the case is agreed at this level, the parties will sign an agreement permitting the Service to assess and collect the agreed amounts. If the parties cannot reach an agreement or if the taxpayer does not respond to the 30-day letter, the appeals officer will issue a statutory notice of deficiency, giving the taxpayer 90 days to appeal to the United States Tax Court.

The Service must issue a statutory notice of deficiency before it assesses additional tax. The Notice gives the taxpayer one last chance to contest the proposed deficiency prior to paying it. A taxpayer has 90 days to file a petition with the Tax Court to redetermine the deficiency. If the taxpayer does not respond to the 90-day letter, the Service will assess the proposed deficiency and will issue a bill to the taxpayer. At this point, the taxpayer must pay the amount assessed. The taxpayer then has the opportunity to contest the assessment by filing a refund claim. If the refund claim is disallowed, the taxpayer may then file a refund suit in United States District Court or United States Court of Claims.

Statutes of Limitations

The Service does not have an unlimited time to examine a tax return. As a general rule, the Service may not assess a tax more than 3 years after the later of the date the return was due or the date the return was actually filed. A special rule applies if the taxpayer omitted from his or her return an amount of gross income that is greater than 25% of the amount of gross income that was included on the return. In such cases, the statute of limitations for assessment is 6 years. In the case of a false or fraudulent return with intent to evade tax, the tax may be assessed at any time. When no return was filed, the tax may be assessed at any time.

In certain circumstances, a taxpayer may agree to extend the statute of limitations. This is done in writing on IRS Form 872 (Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax) or 872-A (Special Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax). A Form 872 extends the time to assess the tax to a specified date. A Form 872-A is a consent extending the period of limitations on assessment for an indefinite period of time. The consent given on Form 872-A can be revoked by filing a Form 872-T, which starts the running of the 90-day period for assessment of tax or issuance of a notice of deficiency. Another special type of consent is a “Restricted Consent” which can be used to extend the statutory period of assessment with respect to specific restricted issues. The statute of limitations is allowed to expire with respect to all other issues. Special statute of limitations rules also apply to tax returns on which a taxpayer failed to include any information required with respect to a “listed transaction” as defined by Code Section 6707A(c)(2). In such cases, the time for assessment does not expire before the date which is one year after the earlier of the date the information is furnished to the Service or the date a material advisor provides the identifying information to the Service.

The decision to extend the statute of limitations must be made carefully. Under certain circumstances, giving consent to extend the statute may benefit the taxpayer. For example, in an unagreed case, consent may be given so that the case can be considered by the appeals division. In other cases, extending a statute may simply provide the agent with additional time to identify and develop additional adjustments.